The title of this article does not hide the gist of its contents. As such, it may trigger a dismissive reflex in most people. After all, isn't it obvious enough what academic contests are all about? Academic contests were not invented just yesterday and many of us have been in one, either as a participant or a mere spectator. So maybe you are asking, how can anybody have a misconception about them. The reason I felt the need to write this article is that there are really those who don't understand what it's all about. At least not, in the context that I am about to discuss here in this article. It's not anybody's fault though why many have these misconceptions. Like I said, academic contests have been around ever since maybe the first school was opened. And each one of those contests followed a consistent pattern. The common concept is that it's all about children pitting their academic skills against their peers, all designed to find out who has the superior brain cells. The contest also focuses mostly in traditional subject areas like language, science and mathematics. Then came Eastbridge and many things seem to be different. And they are different in the most unexpected way, even to a point of being mislabeled as ill-conceived in its design and arbitrary or downright unfair in its choices of participants. To those who have a similar thought, let this article explain the rationale behind the things that we do here.
